阿哲電腦綜合論壇 ![]() | 【新消息】光速通訊將自 93/3/1 推出 3M/384K 產品 剛剛得知的消息,光速通訊將自 93/3/1 推出 3M/384K 產品! 費用方面預計為每個月 1200 元,近日內各位應該就可以在電視上看到促銷廣告了。 ![]() |
回覆 |
累斃了的資電碩一 ![]() | 3M/384 1200啊...和現在2M/384 700比起來... 對我來講可以說是完全不具吸引力阿...xd 我真有需要到3M的話...寧願簽兩條2M/384K的.... |
回覆 |
阿哲電腦綜合論壇 ![]() | 引用:
這樣也不錯喔~~ ![]() | |
回覆 |
會員 ![]() | 的確是沒啥吸引力 尤其是用過它們之前CABLE的舊客戶 以之前那種品質+服務 賣1000我看還怕招不到客戶勒XD 要收1200先拿6M出來跟GIGA抗衡吧~ 或許我還會考慮:P:P |
回覆 |
無 ![]() | 恩恩,如果是3M/512的話那可以考慮說。 |
回覆 |
阿哲電腦綜合論壇 ![]() | 引用:
畢竟公司的假想敵是中華電信~~~ ![]() | |
回覆 |
會員 ![]() | 引用:
但是尖峰時段的速度也是慢到翻掉 我要強調是"慢到翻掉" 除了看網頁(圖不多)和msn可以正常運作外 下載的速度11.4kb/s 這樣就算升到15m/2m也是沒什麼用呀.. (已經是2m/384的用戶) | |
回覆 |
阿哲電腦綜合論壇 ![]() | 引用:
折算一下竟然只有 1.425KBytes/sec ![]() 如果可以的話,希望把該網址給小弟,小弟試試看~~ ![]() | |
回覆 |
會員 ![]() | 引用:
但是還是很慢 參考網址: http://hk.geocities.com/ghhjhdw0jw/av0271048.jpg 參考速度: Pinging 168.95.1.1 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 168.95.1.1: bytes=32 time=222ms TTL=244 Reply from 168.95.1.1: bytes=32 time=154ms TTL=244 Reply from 168.95.1.1: bytes=32 time=162ms TTL=244 Reply from 168.95.1.1: bytes=32 time=197ms TTL=244 Request timed out. Reply from 168.95.1.1: bytes=32 time=105ms TTL=244 Reply from 168.95.1.1: bytes=32 time=125ms TTL=244 Reply from 168.95.1.1: bytes=32 time=96ms TTL=244 Reply from 168.95.1.1: bytes=32 time=115ms TTL=244 Reply from 168.95.1.1: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=244 Reply from 168.95.1.1: bytes=32 time=233ms TTL=244 Request timed out. Reply from 168.95.1.1: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=244 Reply from 168.95.1.1: bytes=32 time=95ms TTL=244 Request timed out. Reply from 168.95.1.1: bytes=32 time=300ms TTL=244 Reply from 168.95.1.1: bytes=32 time=160ms TTL=244 Request timed out. Reply from 168.95.1.1: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=244 Reply from 168.95.1.1: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=244 Reply from 168.95.1.1: bytes=32 time=270ms TTL=244 Reply from 168.95.1.1: bytes=32 time=318ms TTL=244 Reply from 168.95.1.1: bytes=32 time=340ms TTL=244 Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Reply from 168.95.1.1: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=244 Reply from 168.95.1.1: bytes=32 time=162ms TTL=244 Reply from 168.95.1.1: bytes=32 time=115ms TTL=244 Reply from 168.95.1.1: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=244 Reply from 168.95.1.1: bytes=32 time=117ms TTL=244 Request timed out. Request timed out. Reply from 168.95.1.1: bytes=32 time=352ms TTL=244 Reply from 168.95.1.1: bytes=32 time=369ms TTL=244 Reply from 168.95.1.1: bytes=32 time=690ms TTL=244 Reply from 168.95.1.1: bytes=32 time=264ms TTL=244 Reply from 168.95.1.1: bytes=32 time=394ms TTL=244 Reply from 168.95.1.1: bytes=32 time=381ms TTL=244 Reply from 168.95.1.1: bytes=32 time=745ms TTL=244 Reply from 168.95.1.1: bytes=32 time=1658ms TTL=244 Reply from 168.95.1.1: bytes=32 time=1883ms TTL=244 Reply from 168.95.1.1: bytes=32 time=1081ms TTL=244 Request timed out. Reply from 168.95.1.1: bytes=32 time=299ms TTL=244 Reply from 168.95.1.1: bytes=32 time=379ms TTL=244 Request timed out. Reply from 168.95.1.1: bytes=32 time=134ms TTL=244 Reply from 168.95.1.1: bytes=32 time=118ms TTL=244 Request timed out. Ping statistics for 168.95.1.1: Packets: Sent = 50, Received = 38, Lost = 12 (24% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 34ms, Maximum = 1883ms, Average = 327ms | |
回覆 |
會員 ![]() | Pinging lsc.net.tw [203.79.224.59] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=816ms TTL=249 Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=1477ms TTL=249 Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=1506ms TTL=249 Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=1211ms TTL=249 Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=1013ms TTL=249 Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=944ms TTL=249 Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=652ms TTL=249 Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=425ms TTL=249 Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=407ms TTL=249 Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=260ms TTL=249 Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=183ms TTL=249 Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=202ms TTL=249 Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=188ms TTL=249 Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=275ms TTL=249 Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=288ms TTL=249 Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=356ms TTL=249 Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=661ms TTL=249 Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=192ms TTL=249 Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=163ms TTL=249 Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=236ms TTL=249 Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=534ms TTL=249 Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=344ms TTL=249 Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=401ms TTL=249 Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=165ms TTL=249 Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=164ms TTL=249 Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=257ms TTL=249 Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=461ms TTL=249 Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=582ms TTL=249 Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=615ms TTL=249 Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=420ms TTL=249 Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=305ms TTL=249 Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=546ms TTL=249 Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=1091ms TTL=249 Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=512ms TTL=249 Request timed out. Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=146ms TTL=249 Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=192ms TTL=249 Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=563ms TTL=249 Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=145ms TTL=249 Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=154ms TTL=249 Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=249 Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=217ms TTL=249 Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=244ms TTL=249 Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=113ms TTL=249 Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=262ms TTL=249 Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=126ms TTL=249 Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=343ms TTL=249 Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=249 Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=98ms TTL=249 Reply from 203.79.224.59: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=249 Ping statistics for 203.79.224.59: Packets: Sent = 50, Received = 49, Lost = 1 (2% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 92ms, Maximum = 1506ms, Average = 423ms |
回覆 |
|
![]() | ||||
主題 | 主題作者 | 討論版 | 回覆 | 最後發表 |
【新聞】F-Secure 公佈了 Exploit Shield 0.60 Beta 產品 | unknow8877 | -- 防 駭 / 防 毒 版 | 0 | 2009-02-18 02:13 PM |
【新聞】用戶迴路不開放 網友走上街頭(93.07.24) | bluesky88 | ---- "中華電信" ADSL 電路費率討論版 | 0 | 2004-07-25 12:29 AM |
光速通訊1.5M客戶將於 93/3/1免費升級 2M | coolbrother | -- Cable Modem 心 得 交 流 版 | 26 | 2004-03-04 09:51 AM |
請問 2 * WAN Port 產品?? | mis2000 | -- 網 路 硬 體 版 | 3 | 2002-11-06 05:21 PM |
有關 IA 產品 | mchen24 | -- 電 腦 硬 體 討 論 版 | 2 | 2002-05-14 04:17 PM |
XML | RSS 2.0 | RSS |
本論壇所有文章僅代表留言者個人意見,並不代表本站之立場,討論區以「即時留言」方式運作,故無法完全監察所有即時留言,若您發現文章可能有異議,請 email :[email protected] 處理。